MPs who criticized assisted “unpleasant” Esther Rantze Assisted dying

MPs who criticized assisted "unpleasant" Esther Rantze Assisted dying


MPs who die against assisted dying in contrast to Esther RantzeHe argued that many fight against the changes to the law due to secret religious views.

Rantz made the remarks in a letter in which the MPs supported the “strong, safe, carefully respected invoice” to legalize assistants in England and Wales.

A number of MPs who opposed dying in dying said Rantze’s claims that they had not “declared personal religious beliefs that mean that no precautions would satisfy them”.

During a five-hour debate on Friday, MPs voted to change the legislative template to ensure opt-out for the healthcare staff if they are involved in an assisted dying-and the exception to only doctors.

The MPs expect the result of the closure in the lower house in London. Photo: House of Commons/PA

His sponsor Kim Leadbeater also approved a change to prevent those who voluntarily refuse to eat and drink to die in order to protect those suffering from eating disorders.

In a vote in November, the majority of 55 MPs supported the legislative template, and since then the problem has shared the MPs who are considered closely in favor of strong feelings on both sides.

Jess Asato, a Labor MP, was one of those who questioned Rantze’s claims and asked the sponsor of the invoice to be “unpleasant and disrespectful”.

Florence Eshalomi, another Labor MP, also appealed to the topic and said that it was “openly insulted for disabled people, hardworking specialists in the country who have expressed many valid concerns about this law in order to have rejected it as religious beliefs”.

They were supported by Kieran Mullan, the Shadow Justice Minister, who said: “Some top -class activists have not made helpful comments. Although I am not religious, I was concerned about seeing the awkward criticism of those whose objections to the law are centered in their religious beliefs.”

Kim Leadbeater on the phone to Dame Esther Rantzen in the houses of the parliament. Photo: Stefan Rousseau/PA

Ranch, a long -time supporter of the assisted dying personFour was diagnosed with lung cancer in 2023. It was assumed that she only had weeks to live, but last year she started to survive with a “miracle cure” that helped her.

Her daughter revealed that in March, that The drugs of the former child’s founder no longer worked. It meant that it was no longer good enough to travel to Dignitas in Switzerland.

Leadbeater, the Labor MP, who proposes legislation, said that she had not seen recent remarks and argues that the changes would blame the bill and strengthen its protection. She said that assisted dying had to be legalized in order to avoid disastrous sick people from despair or to take traumatic trips to Switzerland.

His supporters say that the legislation has returned with strengthened protective measures after being changed in the committee at the beginning of this year.

But the opponents complained that the draft law does not have enough protection and came through the criticism that come after the days after Two Royal Medical Colleges expressed their doubts about the legislation in its current form.

Florence Eshalomi, a Labor MP, speaks in parliament. Photo: HOC

Some MPs are also unhappy about what they see as a chaotic way of how legislation was discussed. Many MPs who had submitted amendments did not have the chance to speak, and in the end only two changes were made to vote.

The first amendment to change the health system passed and a second change from Tory MP Rebecca Paul was rejected. This would have prevented the employees from offering a supported dying while working for an employer who decided not to take part in the process.

The change in the eating disorder was not selected to coordinate, but leadbeater said that it in principle accepted it and it would be supported at a later date.

Naz Shah, a Labor MP and opponent of the law, had proposed the change and was unhappy about the process. We shouldn’t play games with such human life. “

Another MP said that the voices on Friday were “only skirmishes” and the showdown, which makes it clear whether support has been canceled from the legislative template, is still weeks away. However, they said that many MPs were upset during the trial who meant that problems did not have enough time for debates.

Naz Shah is an opponent of the bill. Photo: HOC

Mike Reader, a Labor MP, said: Regardless of her views on the death -related adults (end of life), also referred to as assisted suicide or assisted dying, people must agree that the time that was assigned for the debate about the proposed changes in the law is not reasonable. I am disappointed that there seems to be a campaign to enforce this, supported by some important and well -financed lobby groups. “

The debate was shaped by protests on both sides, with more than 100 people gathering with posters outside of parliament.

Leadbeater is aimed at a group in parliament, including lady Esther’s daughter Rebecca Wilcox, and said that she is annoyed “If we are obsessed with parliamentary procedures, when it is actually about people, it is actually possible, and I find it annoying because I think it is not a green book, and it is not about paper.”



Source link
Assisted dying,Esther Rantzen,House of Commons,Society,Politics,UK news , , #MPs #criticized #assisted #unpleasant #Esther #Rantze #Assisted #dying, #MPs #criticized #assisted #unpleasant #Esther #Rantze #Assisted #dying, 1747419736, mps-who-criticized-assisted-unpleasant-esther-rantze-assisted-dying

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *