Blake Lively charged due to defamation by PR Group in ‘It Ends with Us’ Feud – National

The It ends with us Legal battle continues – but this time it is between star Blake Lively And a Texas Crisis Communications specialist and his company, Street Relations.

Jed Wallace and Street Relations continue the actor for defamation after it is all about her legal battle with CO star and director in her legal battle Justin Baldoni About the film.

On Tuesday, Wallace submitted a lawsuit of $ 7 million to the federal court in Texas and stated that he had nothing to do with a campaign to damage the reputation of Lively as She claimed in a court application from December 2024. He is also looking for a judicial order stating that he has not entered into intimidation or retribution against Lively.

This came after the Gossip Actor submitted a petition on January 21 looking for a statement from Wallace, which lives alive, was used by publicists who collaborated with Baldoni to ‘create a digital army throughout the country, including in New York and Los Angeles, to Creating, sowing, to manipulate, and regulations of contaminating content that seemed to be authentic on social media platforms and internet chat forums. According to the Hollywood Reporter, Lively’s petition Looking for a judicial order to drop Wallace, it was dropped on Tuesday.

Wallace is not to the defendants in Lively’s Federal lawsuit against BaldoniHis production company and publicists, in which she claims sexual and other intimidation during production and a campaign to smear her afterwards. The crisis specialist was mentioned in the court papers and the story of the New York Times published on the day that the series of legal fights began in December, when Lively filed a complaint.

Wallace’s 10 -page lawsuit says that neither he nor street relationships “had anything to do with the alleged sexual harassment, retribution, not investigating or helping and helping the alleged intimidation or alleged retribution,” According to judicial documents. (Global News has not viewed the documents independently.)

“The actual statements, actual or implicit, of and about claimants in the precursor and CRD complaint are false, defamatory, made with negligence or ‘actual malice’ and have caused millions of dollars in reputation damage, including both general and special damage caused by emotional damage (Wallace), actual damage and real and projected loss of companies (Wallace and Street) in an amount that exceeds more than $ 1,000,000, ”Las Wallace’s application.

“As lively later admitted that she did not know any facts to support the allegations,” wrote Charles Babcock, a lawyer for Wallace, in the complaint. “Neither Wallace nor Street had anything to do with the alleged sexual harassment, retribution, not investigating or helping the alleged intimidation or alleged retribution. Nor could they break a contract with Lively because such a contract does not exist. ‘

In response to the lawsuit, the Lively team of Lively said: “Another day, another state, a court case of nine digits that Mrs Lively wants to” complain in forgotment “for speaking against sexual harassment and retribution.”

“This is not only a publicity stunt – it is transparent retribution in response to allegations in a complaint about sexual harassment and retribution that Mrs. Lively has submitted to the California Civil Rights Department,” her lawyers added to their statement to the media. “Although this lawsuit will be rejected, we are happy that Mr. Wallace has finally emerged from the shade and that he too will be held responsible in the federal court.”

Wallace’s lawyer Babcock has released a statement in response to the Lively Team of Lively. He referred to Wallace as’ a very private person who never met or spoke with Mrs. Lively. Ever.”

“He never entered into a smear campaign against her at any time. The decision to make this lawsuit to rightly protect himself and his family was made after Mrs. Lively had not only first submitted him in Texas, but indicated that she wanted to call him another lawsuit, “Babcock said.

The continuous legal battle between the It ends with us Co stars started afterwards Lively sued Baldoni and he submitted his federal lawsuit against her and her husband, Dead star Ryan Reynoldsaccusing them of defamation and extortion and the search for at least $ 400 million damage.

Baldoni had already charged The New York Times for Smaad, and his former publicist has filed a lawsuit that Koos Koos Koos.

Lively and Baldoni’s case On the way to the court on February 3 When the Lively team of Lively started to discuss a potential gag order.

On 3 February, an American judge lawyers for Baldoni admonished and lively not to publicly discuss the competing civil court cases of the actors. The lawyer of Lively, Michael Gottlieb, complained to a hearing of the American district judge Lewis Liman in the Federal Court of Manhattan that the lawyer of Baldoni Bryan Freedman violated the rules for professional ethics for lawyers by Lively of ‘Bullying’.

“It is very difficult not to rings,” Gottlieb said, with the argument that such statements could affect the jury pool for the planned process of March 9, 2026.

Baldoni’s lawyer Bryan Freedman suggested that his comments to people and in a podcast performance were a reaction to the article of December 21 New York Times that Baldoni ‘completely destroyed’.

“This has not been a one -way street,” he said.

Liman has adopted a rule of the state of New York, with the exception of most extrajudicial statements that can influence the outcome of a case, with an exception to protect a client against adverse negative publicity.

The judge could punish lawyers for violations. Neither Gottlieb nor Freedman objected. Baldoni and Lively were not present during the hearing.

The lawyers of Lively Gottlieb and Esra Hudson said in a statement: “We are satisfied with the result of today’s hearing and enthusiastically to continue immediately with discovery in this case.”

“The court granted our request that all lawyers in the case actually follow the rule of law and do not make any statements that can harm a jury,” they continued. “This case is about serious accusations of sexual harassment and retribution. We will keep the defendants responsible, and we are convinced that as soon as the evidence has been submitted to this matter, Mrs. Lively will prevail. “

Said Freedman“I could no longer be satisfied with how the case was dealt with today. We will move as quickly as possible and prove our innocence. “

It ends with usAn adjustment of the best -selling 2016 novel of Colleen Hoover who starts as a romance, but takes a dark turn in domestic violence, was released in August 2024, which exceeds the expectations of the cash register with a domestic total of almost $ 150 million. The success was followed by almost constant unrest about production and promotion.

–With files of the corresponding press

Curator -recommendations

• Budget -friendly and cozy ways to have a romantic date night at home

• 6 best scalp and hair treatments for ultimate dryness lighting

& Copy 2025 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.