In the first instance, Clemson University took a position for freedom of expression. It condemned the comments of employees that light Charlie Kirk’s Death On social media, but the school said it was committed to protect the Constitution. Three days later, under pressure from conservatives in the Statehouse, it fired one of the employees. As a protest grew and the White House was interested, it fired two more.
The rapid developments at the public university in South Carolina reflect the intense pressure at university leaders nationwide to make insensitive comments about the murder of the conservative activist, which means they have no easy choices.
University of the colleges can defend the Republican return and defend the speech rights of their employees, so that the type of federal attention is requested Billions of dollars in cuts At Harvard and other universities. Or they can bow to the pressure and risk what some scientists see as a historical erosion of Campus Speech Rights.
A Campaign under law To punish that contemptuous Kirk, the industries have cut, where some conservatives call for the dismissal of Employees of the private sectorJournalists and others assess them as a promotion of violence. But the commitment is especially high for colleges, which are already being investigated intensively from an administration that has tried to reform campuses that it describes it as “awake” and overwhelmed by left -wing thinking.
The White House coordinated a call with federal agencies on Monday to discuss “financing options” at Clemson and other universities, according to a person with knowledge of the call who spoke to the condition of anonymity to discuss the private meeting. The White House has not provided any details.
The increasing appetite of the federal government to dictate what can and cannot be said on Campuses about the war in Israel-HAMAS to comment on the death of Kirk-Schendt the first amendment, said Lara Schwartz, an American University Scholar on Constitutional Law and Campus Speech. No matter how unpleasant they are, she said, many comments that provoke indignation are clearly protected speech.
“This could indicate a lot at the end of free speech in the United States,” said Schwartz. “People should not read this, not as a small social media struggle, but as a full constitutional crisis.”
During the weekend, Clemson became the epicenter in a fight between those who worshiped and those who described Kirk. Republicans at all levels hurried to support a campus GOP club that shared Social Media Posts From campus employees who spot the death of Kirk. State laws showed up on the campus with signs that demanded the dismissal of the employees.
One screenshot spread throughout university republicans showed a professor in the audio technology who replaced a message on X on the day of the murder that said: “According to Kirk, Empathy is a made-up New-Age term, so keep the jokes coming. It is what he had wanted.”
In the congress, the Republicans in the House Judiciary Committee responded to Clemson’s statement that defended freedom of expression with a social media in two words: “Defund Clemson.” Legislators of the state threatened to lower financing, including someone whose function was spread by the president Donald Trump.
South Carolina Republican Rep. Nancy Macewho applies to Governor, sent a letter to the educational department on Monday and insisted on drawing all federal financing of schools and universities that do not quickly end employees “who would celebrate or justify political violence.”
Prior to an emergency meeting by the Clemson Board of Directors on Monday, the Republican attorney general of the State sent a letter that ensured leaders that the dismissals would be permitted in accordance with the State Act. Alan Wilson said that dismissed employees can dispute the dismissal in civil matters, but Clemson or other universities would not be prosecuted according to a state law that prohibits dismissals on the basis of political opinions.
“Fear of criminal prosecution, the president of a state university, such as Clemson, is not allowed to scare the correct corrective measures against university employees for such despicable and fire trousers comments on a public platform,” Wilson wrote.
An employee was fired before the meeting and Clemson announced on Tuesday that it had two others rejectedBoth faculty members.
Conservatives that call for the dismissals said that glorifying and celebrating violence also encourages it, to be put into speech that is not protected by the Constitution. Attorney -General Pam Bondi Promised to go behind those whose speech violence threatens in the aftermath of Kirk’s murder.
“We have seen far too long how the radical links had the threats normalized, to evoke murders and encourage political violence,” she said. “That era is over.”
Educational secretary Linda McMahon On Wednesday, schools and colleges encouraged to fight everyone who celebrated the murder. In a video version, she said that such comments are the product of universities and schools that breed ‘division of ideologies’.
“I recommend the institutions and leaders who have acted quickly to condemn and hold those who have exceeded this ethical line,” she said.
Various colleges have fired or suspended employees because of comments about Kirk, including the University of Miami, the University of Tennessee, Auburn University and the University of California, Los Angeles.
Others have warned that they are investigating social media messages. For example, the board of the regents of Iowa enabled the public universities of the State to take immediate action, including termination. President Sherry Bates said that posts were “offensive, inappropriate and especially unacceptable last week.”
“We expect more from those who work at our institutions,” she said.
Some university leaders have sought to find a balance and to condemn callige comments while they have a commitment with principles of the first amendment. In Georgia, the president of Columbus State University, Stuart Rayfield, said that a function of a professor who received online was regrettable, but faculties and students have “the right to their own personal views under the first amendment.”
The leaders of the University of Missouri on Wednesday said they respect the rights of employees to speak as citizens, but they encouraged staff to “use those freedoms in a responsible manner, especially when they are concerned with social media.”
___
Associated Press writer Alanna Durkin Richer has contributed to this report.
___
The coverage of the Associated Press receives financial support from several private foundations. AP is only responsible for all content. Find APs standards For working with philanthropias, one list From supporters and funded coverage areas on AP.org.
Source link
Politics , Politics,Murder of Charlie Kirk,Censorship,Colleges and universities,Education,Article,125724701 , #pressure #police #remarks #KIRK #colleges #running #cord #free #speech, #pressure #police #remarks #KIRK #colleges #running #cord #free #speech, 1758294953, under-pressure-on-police-remarks-on-kirk-colleges-are-running-a-cord-on-free-speech
