Naomi Campbell claims that she does not know about financial misconduct at Charity | Charity organizations

The supermodel Naomi Campbell Has said that she knew nothing about the extensive financial misconduct and mismanagement in the board member of Anti-Poverty Fashion, which she created and sat on the board for more than five years.

Campbell was disqualified in May 2024 before the publication of A by the leadership of a charity organization Devastating watchdog report That revealed A Trace of the administrative chaosAbuse of charity funds and chaotic records.

Your charity organization, fashion for relief, spent tens of thousands of pounds for luxury hotel rooms, flights, spa treatments, personal security and cigarettes for Campbell and only a fraction of the donations that she had put on went well.

Campbell, 54, who is Try to reverse The five -year prohibition that she imposed on the charity commission claimed that she was the victim of a “concerted deception” against her by a colleague who encouraged her in the dark about the running of the charity and the commission’s intention, and the intention of the Commission To prohibit them.

In a charity -Tribunal hearing on Friday, the lawyers of Campbell said that she was a “victim of fraud and falsification”, including a fake e -mail account, of which she claimed that the former fashion for the relief goods Bianka Hellmich forced them in communication with lawyers.

Hellmich told The Guardian at the beginning of this week that there was “absolutely no truth” in the allegations. Neither Hellmich, which was disqualified for nine years, or a third ex-trustee, Veronica Chou, spoke against their disqualifications.

Experts for charitable purposes say that it is rare for a charity court to lift a disqualification order, and even if Campbell can prove that a fake e -mail account was used, it may not be sufficient to reverse the commission.

Liz Brownsell, the head of charity at the Birketts law firm, said: “Naomi Campbell has publicly admitted that she was not involved in the management of the charity and that she was not involved failed in their duties As a trustee. Charity controller cannot be passive in their role and a failure to act the action can be the mismanagement in the administration of the charity.

“Ultimately, the decision of the tribunal about its disqualification is raised on the basis of the evidence of how it has fulfilled its duties as a trustee and whether the tribunal corresponds to the commission’s assessment that it cannot act as a charity.”

On Friday at the Tribunal, lawyers requested for them and the commission differently the disclosure of documents. Campbell’s lawyers failed to force the Commission to disclose their case files.

In written arguments for Campbell, lawyer Andrew Westwood said that the disqualification order was incorrectly created because it was “not appropriate or not able to be able to do at all” during the request.

He told the court: “It is Ms. Campbell’s case that she was excluded due to the deception that was practiced on her without the opportunity to react to the reasons for the disqualification and without the documents dependent on the commission See this action. “

Faisel Sadiq informed the Tribunal on Friday that Campbell’s position should “not criticize”, but to say that she was a victim of fraud and that her case was brought to the point that she “knew” nothing about it ” . And was a “flagship”.

Campbell said at the beginning of this week that she had had “to uncover the facts” since the Commission published in September and that “she had never done a philanthropic work for personal profits, and I will not do so either”.